butcher/README.md

140 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown

# butcher
#### Chops a command or program invocation into digestable pieces.
Similar to the `optparse-applicative` package, but less features,
more flexibility and more evil.
The main differences are:
* Provides a pure interface by default
* Exposes an evil monadic interface, which allows for much nicer binding of
command part results to some variable name.
In `optparse-applicative` you easily lose track of what field you are
modifying after the 5th `<*>` (admittedly, i think -XRecordWildCards
improves on that issue already.)
Evil, because you are not allowed to use the monad's full power in this
case, i.e. there is a constraint that is not statically enforced.
See below.
* The monadic interface allows much clearer definitions of commandparses
with (nested) subcommands. No pesky sum-types are necessary.
## Examples
The minimal example is
~~~~.hs
main = mainFromCmdParser $ addCmdImpl $ putStrLn "Hello, World!"
~~~~
But lets look at a more feature-complete example:
~~~~.hs
main = mainFromCmdParserWithHelpDesc $ \helpDesc -> do
addCmdSynopsis "a simple butcher example program"
addCmdHelpStr "a very long help document"
addCmd "version" $ do
porcelain <- addSimpleBoolFlag "" ["porcelain"]
(flagHelpStr "print nothing but the numeric version")
addCmdHelpStr "prints the version of this program"
addCmdImpl $ putStrLn $ if porcelain
then "0.0.0.999"
else "example, version 0.0.0.999"
addCmd "help" $ addCmdImpl $ print $ ppHelpShallow helpDesc
short <- addSimpleBoolFlag "" ["short"]
(flagHelpStr "make the greeting short")
name <- addStringParam "NAME"
(paramHelpStr "your name, so you can be greeted properly")
addCmdImpl $ do
if short
then putStrLn $ "hi, " ++ name ++ "!"
else putStrLn $ "hello, " ++ name ++ ", welcome from butcher!"
~~~~
Further:
- [Full description of the above example, including sample behaviour](example1.md)
- [Example of a pure usage of a CmdParser](example2.md)
- [Example of using a CmdParser on interactive input](example3.md)
- The [brittany](https://github.com/lspitzner/brittany) formatting tool is a
program that uses butcher for implementing its commandline interface. See
its [main module source](https://github.com/lspitzner/brittany/blob/master/src-brittany/Main.hs)
or [the config flag parser](https://github.com/lspitzner/brittany/blob/master/src/Language/Haskell/Brittany/Config.hs).
## The evil monadic interface
As long as you only use Applicative or (Kleisli) Arrow, you can use the
interface freely. When you use Monad, there is one rule: Whenever you read
any command-parts like in
~~~~
f <- addFlag ...
p <- addParam ...
~~~~
you are only allowed to use bindings bound thusly in any command's
implemenation, i.e. inside the parameter to `addCmdImpl`. You are _not_
allowed to force/inspect/patternmatch on them before that. _good_ usage is:
~~~~
addCmdImpl $ do
print x
print y
~~~~
while _bad_ would be
~~~~
f <- addFlag
when f $ do
p <- addParam
-- evil: the existence of the param `p`
-- depends on parse result for the flag `f`.
~~~~
That means that checking if a combination of flags is allowed must be done
after parsing. (But different commands and their subcommands (can) have
separate sets of flags.)
## (abstract) Package intentions
Consider a commandline invocation like "ghc -O -i src -Main.hs -o Main". This
package provides a way for the programmer to simultaneously define the
semantics of your program based on its arguments and retrieve documentation
for the user. More specifically, i had three goals in mind:
1. Straight-forward description of (sub)command and flag-specific behaviour
2. Extract understandable usage/help commandline documents/texts from that
descriptions, think of `ghc --help` or `stack init --help`.
3. Extract necessary information to compute commandline completion results
from any partial input. (This is not implemented to any serious degree.)
## Semantics
(Sorry, this description is severely lacking, I know.)
Basic elements of a command are flags, parameters and subcommands. These can
be composed in certain ways, i.e. flags can have a (or possibly multiple?)
parameters; parameters can be grouped into sequences, and commands can have
subcommands.
Commands are essentially `String -> Either ParseError out` where `out` can
be chosen by the user. It could for example be `IO ()`.
To allow more flexible composition, the parts of a command have the "classic"
parser's type: `String -> Maybe (p, String)` where `p` depends on the part.
Parse a prefix of the input and return something and the remaining input, or
fail with `Nothing`.
A command-parser contains a sequence of parts and then a number of subcommands
and/or some implementation.