Support GHC 8.10 #324
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
blocked: dependency
blocked: info-needed
bug
duplicate
enhancement
fixed in HEAD
help wanted
hs:arrows
hs:brackets
hs:classes
hs:comments
hs:do-notation
hs:guards
hs:lists
hs:operators
hs:patterns
hs:records
hs:types
invalid
language extension support
layouting
needs confirmation
priority: high
priority: low
question
revisit before next release
wontfix
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: hexagoxel/brittany#324
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
There is no content yet.
Delete Branch "gh-269-ghc-8.10"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may exist for a short time before cleaning up, in most cases it CANNOT be undone. Continue?
Continuing work from #312.
Now there is a legitimate test failure against GHC 8.10. It's related to #48. I don't know enough to fix it.
https://github.com/lspitzner/brittany/pull/324/checks?check_run_id=1403080234#step:7:1202
Looking at
--dump-full-ast
from brittany with 8.8 and brittany with 8.10, we can see a difference:where 8.8 returns:
8.10 returns a hole!
It's also not valid syntax as ghci tells us:
I think it's fine to remove this test (or correct it so that it has the space before the
@
)It's surprising to me that the AST can even represent this, although perhaps it's useful for error messages or something
👍
Need to update the supported GHC versions in the readme
I should make sure there are
stack.yaml
files for each configuration. Then I think this will be ready to go.@tfausak would you like any help with this release?
Sorry! Thanks for the ping. I don't need any help with this, I just have to actually do it. With any luck I should be able to spend some time on it in the next few days.